Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
Plan sponsors have no incentive to overpay for health plan services because it is a material corporate expense. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
The case is Lee v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
KBM, as detailed in U.S.A. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
FlightSafety Services Corporation, Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
International Trade Commission, 616 F.3d 1318, 1328 (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
CLASS ACTION CHALLENGES REDUCTION OF MEDICAID HOME-CARE SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 8:43 am
The prime example, of course, is the decades-long attack on the Legal Services Corporation. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
Virtually every case involving a wedding service provider involves a small, close-knit company. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
But sometimes their vendors — their service providers who, you know, can’t compete with ours — are essentially trying to set up some roadblocks for our companies to operate effectively there. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
Federal Election Commission, corporations have strong free speech rights). [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
The thematic tracks will allow participants to delve into substantive areas such as: the role of public policy and national action plans; challenges faced and progress made by companies in integrating the corporate responsibility to respect human rights both in policy and practice; ways to enhance accountability and access to effective remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuse; the integration of the Guiding Principles in global governance structures; and… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
§ 56:8-1(d) defines “The term “person” as used in this act [to] include any natural person or his legal representative, partnership, corporation, company, trust, business entity or association, and any agent, employee, salesman, partner, officer, director, member, stockholder, associate, trustee or cestuis que trustent thereof. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Meese (1991): In our case, the Advisory Commission had no … tie to prosecutorial power nor authority to censor publications. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
As the Securities andamp; Exchange Commission former enforcement chief, William R. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
The 1995 Policy Statement on Prior Approval and Prior Notice Provisions made it less likely that the Commission would require parties that proposed mergers that the Commission had determined would be anticompetitive to obtain prior approval and give prior notice for future transactions. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
