Search for: "Pace v. Mays"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
Additionally, the notice letter is supposed to provide information advising the individual or entity of their right to appeal their inclusion on the list.[7] V. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
This is not to apply a subjective test (pace the fifth reason given in Danesh). [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 10:01 pm
In Perfect 10 v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
” The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:58 am
Pace of Bank Failures Slows – But More Closures Loom: Earlier this year (refer here), I had noted that it seemed as if the pace of bank failures had finally started to decline. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., 105 F.3d 1090, 1100 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998)). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
The name of the game is to match the hair to the IP personality.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:55 pm
Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time, but may involve occasional walking or standing for brief periods of time. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
In the recent landmark US Supreme Court case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
[h]e was pacing, he was fidgeting, I thought he was on something. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:29 pm
In Lehman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 11:16 am
How long does it take you to toss that award citing Newport v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
historical angle to what may sound like another volumeof this year's dieting dogma. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
. may be strictly liable as a supplier”). [read post]
