Search for: "Patel v. Patel"
Results 481 - 500
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
In SN Prasad v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:43 am
In the subject of this blog, Miller v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
(Cob) Blaha Social Media The Oversight Board Needs Access to Facebook’s Algorithms to do its Job by Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) and Julian Melendi (@JulianMelendi) Ukraine Corruption in Ukraine: Myths and Reality by Mykola Stetsenko FISA Reform Is Secret Law the Solution to an Overbroad Surveillance Authority? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm
(City of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
In Ransom v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel agreed with IBM and dismissed Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:57 am
Patel of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
We’ll begin with Patel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times focuses on Kiobel, as do Daniel Fisher of Forbes, the Brennan Center’s Faiza Patel and Emin Akopyan, and James Vicini of Reuters. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:24 pm
Feb.23, 2010) (citing Patel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
Patel and involved the ability of local police to access guest register lists at hotels. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
It does not appear to address the more fundamental debate taking place on these issues.It is also perhaps worth recalling that the English courts recently strayed into this discussion (perhaps unknowingly) in Patel v Allos [2008]. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm
See here and here.Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:55 am
See the uncited Standard Process v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 7:40 am
22 articles in this issue The Possibility of a Uniform Legal Language at the Interplay of Legal Discourse, Semiotics and Blockchain Networks Pierangelo Blandino … [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Patel v Oldham MBC, heard before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that when assessing whether the impairment will last for 12 months or more, it is necessary to consider whether another illness is likely to develop or has developed for the purpose of Schedule 1 paragraph 2 of the DDA. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Steiner v. [read post]
