Search for: "People v. Poole" Results 481 - 500 of 1,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by Rumpole
We're not sure what to do, other than publicize that the names of the individuals we use in the pool are not represented by us or anyone to be those actual people. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:52 am
The idea that WARF could (or even would) block research by academics is a silly, make-weight argument designed to scare people. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:06 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Study shows MMA fighters suffer brain injury in one third of bouts, April 12, 2016, Irish Times, By Muiris Houston More Blog Entries: Snaras v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
 The United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
For example, he argues that if a company chooses a mark like BABY SAFE for pool fencing, instead of say FENCE-A-POOL, the company can more likely register the mark without proving secondary meaning, since it's not directly descriptive of what the product really does. (26-27).I am not sure this is necessarily true. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
v=TD3Rz45DEpQ This is kind of like that SNL sketch, although maybe not as funny. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:36 am by Marcia Coyle
The pool was narrowed to 256 people and then each of those potential jurors was questioned in voir dire that took a total of 21 days. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:49 pm by James Saksa
  On top of that, higher leverage means greater return on equity, and fewer shareholders means fewer people you need to split the profits with. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
For example, the Fifth Circuit in Stokes v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]