Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)"
Results 481 - 500
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Weems v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Kardesch deviated from the standard of care while treating her husband and that Dr. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
But I don't buy the standard doctrine.) [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
But I don't buy the standard doctrine.) [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The problem, however, is that some people just don’t much like being “n [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Under California law, a statute enacted by the people through the initiative process may not be repealed or superseded through ordinary legislation. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
" Christopher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
The lawsuit, Sevick v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
It thereby lifts liability without necessarily compelling cooperation, as Michael Becker flagged following the magistrate judge’s initial ruling in The Gambia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In 1986, the Supreme Court gave the green light to the approach set out by the EEOC, holding, in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
As the UK government has explained, DRIPA “makes clear that anyone providing a communications service to customers in the UK – regardless of where that service is provided from – should comply with lawful requests” for production.[17] In other words, the UK’s laws compelling production turn not on the location of stored data, but on something more like the U.S. legal standard for asserting personal jurisdiction over the custodian of data:[18] … [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the prosecutor explained that the juror was struck because she was a social worker. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
(Ms Hacio had worked for the City for 42 years and had been the General Manager from 1986 until retirement in 2002. [read post]
