Search for: "People v. Stark"
Results 481 - 500
of 747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:06 pm
It is now the subject of a class action lawsuit in Floyd v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Until 2004, no state permitted people of the same sex to marry, and thus a marriage between two people of the same sex would be void—as if it never happened. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
See Marder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm
See Marder v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:50 am
In AT&T v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:31 am
By Amy Clarise AshworthState v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
RSC spokesman Brian Staessle remarked upon retracting the brief that ”we hope people will now use this opportunity to engage in polite and serious discussion of copyright law. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
The choice is pretty stark, and I suspect most people and most Justices will have an intuitive sense that either it’s perfectly fine to bring the dog to the front steps or it’s a pretty dangerous practice that clearly steps over the line. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
These changes lessened individual liberties in favor of an involved government and reduced individual responsibility, helping to create today’s ‘everybody-gets-a-trophy’ counterculture—a stark contrast to the successful American model. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:59 am
In that case, Lopez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
" What Pete Stark said was, yes, corporations are people, which suggests that he's comfortable with the Supreme Court's reasoning. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
” Miller v. [read post]
