Search for: "People v. Weathers" Results 481 - 500 of 591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am by Colin Murray
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The “burning bush” question in our law schools today is, why don’t our law societies free our people from this land of unaffordable legal services, and our courts from self-represented litigants? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Adam Wagner
” 21 July | Frans Cornelis Adrianus VAN ANRAAT v the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) A man was prosecuted for supplying thiodiglycol (mustard gas) to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
We've suffered Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by admin
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
This legal theory stems from a 1975 Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]