Search for: "People v. Wells (1985)"
Results 481 - 500
of 921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
At this time of year (well, honestly, at all times of year), I very much enjoy scouring around for movies that are fun, interesting, and, above all, scary. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
See Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
[Emphasis added.]As stated more recently in Hryniak v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
The 1985 Illinois case People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
The statute is thus unconstitutionally overbroad in this respect as well. 3. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am
The Housing Act 1985 therefore regards overcrowding not only in relation to the number of bedrooms and the people in bedrooms but those who could sleep in a living room [sic] It is an assessment of the overall number of people in the property compared to the rooms and space available. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:17 am
Section 4 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
Defendant acknowledges that this claim was rejected by the First Department in People v Ferrer but argues, inter alia, that the decision is so conclusory that it cannot act as a barrier to consideration by this Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Lawyers without scientific training or aptitude are not likely to serve clients, whether plaintiffs or defendants, well in the post-Daubert litigation world. [read post]
