Search for: "Phillip Brown"
Results 481 - 500
of 682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
In the Guardian Gill Phillips argued that the decision had “significant ramifications for the law on defamation”. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
In the words of Lord Phillips, it is the “cause of action formerly known as confidence”. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court has, belatedly, posted the “Case Details” for this case, which show that the proposed bench for the hearing is Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown, with Sir John Dyson as the fifth member of the court. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:09 pm
” Guardian lawyer Gill Phillips said the statement clearly showed Surrey Police linked the potential deletions to the News of the World in 2002, but admitted her paper had made an error in reporting the cause of the deletions as fact rather than the belief of several people involved in the case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:08 am
And it’s a recent Case Management endorsement by Justice Brown. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Property owner Fred Phillips (no relation) explained his frustrations this way: Why pay taxes? [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:35 am
Phillip Jones/National Guard Photo: Decommissioned military equipment is strategically dropped off the coast of South Carolina, where it will become one of many artificial reefs made of retired weapons of war. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
Phillip C. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Charles Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am
The appeal was heard and shall be considered by a five justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Wilson. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Brown, 2009 WL 5220297 (D. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
The Committee was composed of many pre-eminent figures in media law: Chair Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury (Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice), Desmond Browne QC (5 Raymond Buildings), Rod Christie-Miller (Schillings), Michelle Dyson (Ministry of Justice), Lord Justice Moore-Bick (Deputy Head of Civil Justice), Marcus Partington (Trinity Mirror Plc), Alasdair Pepper (Carter-Ruck), Gillian Phillips (The Guardian), John Sorabji (Barrister) and Mr Justice Michael Tugendhat. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Dickson Phillips, Jr., of the U. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:52 am
Dr Erasmus Strangelove Strength & Profits *** *** With thanks to Inksters Solicitors, Cellmark, OnlineWill.co.uk, BPP University College, David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Wildy & Sons, Camps Solicitors accident claims Suffered an accident at work? [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The panel will be Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:31 am
In a seven-page opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the court should have sent the case back for another look. [read post]
