Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 481 - 500
of 177,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The court agreed with the Plaintiff’s argument that the Complaint sufficiently pled a negligence cause of action against the individual Defendants as possessors of the property where the Plaintiff was injured, although not necessarily as corporate officers or agents. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
”Since there were “triable issues of fact,” as to whether the defendants had been “negligent in the maintenance of their gas system that serviced the subject premises and whether that negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries,” and because they had not unequivocally established the use of “reasonable care in their handling and distribution of natural gas to the premises leading up to an explosion,” the AD2 affirmed… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
It’s not an exacting standard. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Plaintiff United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) enthusiastically supported the law’s bipartisan passage. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
In deciding if a claim is moot a court must determine whether it can grant the plaintiff any effectual relief. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm
Plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit, but the trio of judges on Monday appeared inclined to side with the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:39 pm
Therefore, the failure to pay premiums upon separation were not “willful” and did not warrant “waiting time penalties” (i.e., Spectrum was not required to pay the employee-plaintiff 30 days’ pay for failing to pay premiums owing at the time of separation). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion, the plaintiffs argue, in to the contrary. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:28 pm
If the court agrees with the plaintiffs, the decision will have implications for the 2024 rule as well. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm
The two defendants in turn sued plaintiff’s employer with similar allegations. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:05 pm
And so petitions for leave often make other arguments besides a need to change the result in the petitioner’s own case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
Their first step was to read Judge Seeley’s district court opinion, which ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and outlined two novel areas of law in relation to climate action: climate rights and dignity law. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
Jun. 5, 2024) Abbott Laboratories’s Glucerna line of powders and shakes are marketed as scientifically designed for people with diabetes to help manage blood sugar. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:48 am
However, the extent of plaintiff’s injuries were contested. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
The plaintiff, Good, registered an Uber account in 2013. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
” It explained that a case becomes moot when events render it impossible, should the Court decide to rule in favor of the plaintiff, for it to grant plaintiff any effective relief. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Solicitor General will weigh in on is whether federal law bars the plaintiffs’ state-law claims. [read post]
