Search for: "Prime v. State Bar" Results 481 - 500 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
On June 12, Prime Minister Harper told Fox News [12] that "that Canada is not willing to take in Guantanamo Bay detainees. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:57 am by JoLynn Markison
This issue recently was litigated before a Connecticut federal court in Westport Resources Management v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:57 am by JoLynn Markison
This issue recently was litigated before a Connecticut federal court in Westport Resources Management v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
– After the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Therefore: (1) the “prime directive” of the national standards states: “an organization shall always be prepared to produce its records as evidence”; and, (2) the proof of “records system integrity” required by the electronic records provisions is very necessary. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am by Weronika Galka
Melanie Zanona, Frank Thorp V, and Garrett Haake report for NBC News. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Another straw appeared in the wind on April 6 of that year, when then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch[1] gave a strong and unusually strident speech before the spring meeting of the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, singling out anticompetitive mergers for especially pointed criticism, and dismissing some recent proposed transactions as unworthy even of contemplation by the firms involved—a theme laced with scorn for antitrust counselors, their business clients, and the… [read post]