Search for: "RAY v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC; Federalist Society panel video with Gregory Dolin, John Duffy, Arti Ray, and Robert Greene Sterne; Jeffri Kaminski, WLF] Collins v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Ray Malooly Tr. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Ray Malooly Tr. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld &… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Sellers, which asks when a federal court should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
Ray C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am
The Canadian Supreme Court (Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34) affirmed the decision from the Supreme Court in British Columbia and ordered Google to delist a tech company’s website(s) worldwide. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:15 am
Her age discrimination claim failed, however (Weber v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
Rai Duke University School of Law; Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship Initiative Abstract This is a brief of 72 IP professors opposing the claim in Oil States that the IPR procedure is unconstitutional.Petitioner argues that only a court – indeed, only a jury – has the power to decide that the United States Patent and Trademark Office erred in granting a patent. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
The case is Google v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm
by Dennis Crouch The final group of amicus briefs were filed this past week in Oil States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:14 am
Golden v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:14 am
Golden v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:11 am
These issues suggested to the court that although there were many “close calls,” the FMLA interference and retaliation claims were best left to a jury (West v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:39 pm
Fourth, they close the serious part of the show with the decision of the Irish High Court in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
See Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Frank Adams v. [read post]
