Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 481 - 500
of 71,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
14 May 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONPeople v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 11:00 pm
LLC v S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:48 pm
When truck operators exceed safe driving limits due to manipulated records, the risk escalates for all road users. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm
Every use of ESD is recorded, as is every behavior that falls within the intended use. [read post]
13 May 2024, 10:10 am
The order in Sandoval v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:11 am
., et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court took a significant step in Murray v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
Blanford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The record before the Board of Trustees also revealed that the petitioner did not include a claim relating to her right knee in her initial benefits application and only asserted such a claim after that application was rejected (see Matter of Williams v Ward, 227 AD2d 307, 308). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The record before the Board of Trustees also revealed that the petitioner did not include a claim relating to her right knee in her initial benefits application and only asserted such a claim after that application was rejected (see Matter of Williams v Ward, 227 AD2d 307, 308). [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:45 am
The Gomez Factors In laying out the facts of the case, the higher court noted that one case in particular, Gomez v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
"Translation: I have now been subject to a "high tech lynching" and to word bombs as harmful as real bombs, and that is why, and the only real reason why, I want to overturn New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:41 am
The case is entitled Hughes et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
” In re Marriage of Harnack, 2022 IL App (1st) 210143 Contempt is when “[a] party who understands the court’s order but chooses to ignore the mandate” Killion v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
