Search for: "STATE v FLOYD"
Results 481 - 500
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 6:47 am
., it will air the oral arguments in Loving v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Court of Appeal Before Jackson, Lloyd Jones and Floyd LJJ, [2013] EWCA Civ 616 (see here), the Home Secretary argued that the decision made Pham de facto stateless (with nationality but denied the protection which should go with it), but not de jure stateless (without nationality under the laws of any state) and therefore it did not make him stateless within the meaning of section 40(4) of the 1981 Act. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:16 am
[Asadi v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:48 pm
Park v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
” Floyd LJ cited the case of Bankers Trust Co v Namdar [1997] EGCS 20 in contrast to the present case. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
Behold the case of British Academy of Songwriters, Composers And Authors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation And Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (BASCA v BIS for short). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
30 May 2015, 5:42 am
United States. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
In a judgment handed down today Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556 the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Justice Floyd) has put forward a wider test for the infringement of second medical use patents. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
University of Maryland-Eastern Shore, May 21, 2015, Floyd, H.). [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:22 pm
Conflict of Laws: NJ law applied where a special state interest existedSpiros v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:54 pm
PPV viewers in at least six states have filed putative class action lawsuits arising out of the recent “Fight of the Century” between Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and Manny Pacquiao. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:12 pm
("J & J Sports") of Campbell, California filed two federal lawsuits in the Northern District of Indiana, both alleging illegal interception of a cable signal for the Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:26 am
Descarga el documento: Rodríguez v. [read post]
