Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN> Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Since what the Directive purports to protect is privacy rather than economic rights, it would be strange if the Directive could not compensate those individuals whose data privacy had been invaded by a data controller so as to cause them emotional distress (but not pecuniary damage). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Yet in Anderson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:02 pm
PNC Bank and Strang v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
In Sarah Milov’s paper, “Clearing the Air: Shimp v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 3:46 am
Jennings v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am
For the Associated Press, Wayne Parry previews Christie v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
In Westwood Apex v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
But doing so with respect to issue preclusion seems strange, especially since this seems more of a "procedural" thing (e.g., the future effect of the judgment) and also because the diversity case might be applying the substantive law of a different state (e.g., here, Delaware) and yet we're applying Nevada substantive law to preclusion. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
For those of you who are novices in this strange and wondrous area, 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But are you also guilty of the (much bigger) felony offense of bringing drugs into jail in violation of Penal Code sect. 4573, which states that "Except when otherwise authorized . . . any person who, knowingly brings or sends into, or knowingly assists in bringing into, or sending into, any state prison . . . or into any county . . . jail . . . any controlled substance . . . is guilty of a felony. . . . [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
The Royal Albert Hall is a cultural icon, so it's strange that it so rarely gets a mention on this most cultural of weblogs. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
Cook v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am
She was seized anyway even though she denied any strange behavior, stated the police would have to arrest her if they wanted to interview her daughter, and she was uncooperative and irrational. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]