Search for: "Samuel Harms" Results 481 - 500 of 1,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
” Roberts announces that Justice Samuel Alito has the opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am by Eugene Volokh
(the corporation that publishes Scotusblog); and Daniel Epps and Ian Samuel, who at the time did the First Mondays podcast about the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm by Megan Carpenter
” Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Also in the VIP section are Martha-Ann Alito, the wife of Justice Samuel Alito, and Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen Breyer. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
Instead, the majority decision, written by Justice Samuel Alito, relies heavily on the longstanding nature of the memorial to uphold its constitutionality. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
While the critique of excessive delegation did not carry the day this time (the vote was 4-3-1 with Justice Brett Kavanaugh not participating), Justice Samuel Alito indicated that he would be inclined to look at the issue in a future case, and Kavanaugh is thought (from his D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for a majority of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh, reversing the 2nd Circuit. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:23 am by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
This change was driven by a review of gender stereotypes in adverts and the potential harm they could cause. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Samuels v Birmingham City Council, heard 31 Jan 2019. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:56 am by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas (in an opinion joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch) filed a relatively rare statement in which he agreed with the court’s decision not to take Price’s case. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Its brief to that effect was filed on May 1, 2019.There are essentially three problems with the district court’s ruling, now backed by the Justice Department: its determination that (1) the private plaintiffs had standing under Article III of the Constitution (the standing of the state parties had been rejected below); (2) the individual mandate could not be justified as an exercise of Congress’s commerce power; and (3) the void individual mandate was inseverable from the rest of the… [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:39 am by The Murray Law Firm
Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[Longtime LHB readers will recall that for the exam in my legal history course at Georgetown Law i write an essay about some regulatory regime I did not cover in class and ask students to draw comparisons with those we did. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:25 pm by Amy Howe
Even more broadly, Thomas suggested, Breyer’s approach would “harm victims. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:53 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented from the ruling, in an opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:00 pm by admin
If someone harms you or threatens harm, you could have a valid claim for damages. [read post]