Search for: "Shapiro v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
In PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:02 am
HHS tests the limits of the federal government’s ability to control and compel commercial speech” [Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato amicus brief in D.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:17 pm
But the California Supreme Court on Thursday seemed resigned to the inevitability of it in a case testing the state’s anti-spam law. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am
Wright/WLF, earlier] Dear SCOTUS: certification of a class action should be based on admissible evidence [Andrew Grossman, Ilya Shapiro, and Meggan DeWitt on Cato cert amicus brief in Taylor Farms v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) proposes to regulate social media bots, or to put it differently, to regulate a form of speech carried on through automated mechanisms [John Samples, Cato] “The State of New Jersey Wants to Subsidize News. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
At The Hill’s Congress Blog, Ilya Shapiro looks ahead to the upcoming decision in Harris v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
Times previews Holder v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am
Over at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the supplemental amicus brief that the Cato Institute recently filed in Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
Karl Llewellyn haunted the Supreme Court this term, when Ali v Federal Bureau of Prisons was handed down on January 22nd. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In a third post at Cato, Ilya Shapiro raises a glass to Wednesday’s opinion in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
