Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 481 - 500
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
Interestingly, their reticence to address this central jurisdictional question is at sharp variance with their counterparts in Perry. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
“The requirement that retaliation plaintiffs demonstrate that in fact they suffered injury because of having engaged in a protected act is not surprising in light of the precise words of the statute,” said Pointer. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
Supreme Court in a 7-1 decision (Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, June 24, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
The debates about the NDAAs have often created more heat than light, however. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:52 pm
In a recent opinion, Hardeman County v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:26 am
Weeks v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Covell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
Relying on Mandl v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
As I had stated earlier, the Policy comes in the light of the realization that treating innovation and S&T as two disconnected realms was a serious lacuna especially when the former has now assumed centre stage in the developmental goals of countries around the world. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
The apparently sharp distinction between judicially created private law principles, and democratically enacted legislative rules and policies, is therefore questioned, and it is argued that to describe the principles of the law of tort without referring to statute is potentially highly misleading. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Progress also serves as a sharp- edged ruler held by whomever is the current victor: it divides civilizations into civilized and un-civilized, the latter fit for conquering and exploiting as they are brought into progress, into the light. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 8:42 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
