Search for: "Shell v. Shell"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
However, he relied on the well-established exception to that rule where the statute imposes an obligation for the benefit or protection of a particular class of individuals (per Lord Diplock in Lonrho v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173.) [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
The second in a series, it follows this one: http://www.popehat.com/2011/10/05/shell-sing-for-you-part-1/. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Landmark cases include Milieudefensie v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:50 am
The floor would not raise or lower evenly and jammed inside the pool shell, damaging the pool shell and wood flooring. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:39 pm
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
There's an important new opinion, Bass v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
Little v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:46 pm
The appellate courts in Doe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
One example is the conviction he secured in the case of People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2005, 12:32 pm
Shell Oil Co. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:04 am
Further readingNothing to see here, Lilly wins in kicking out Genentech's Talz progeny patent (for now) (Feb 2020)Another case of catastrophic comma loss (T 1473/19): Interpreting the claims in view of the description (Jan 2023)Adding matter by amending the description to exclude embodiments (Ensygnia v Shell [2023] EWHC 1495 (Pat)) (Aug 2023)Image credit: DALLE-3 [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:08 am
Zenergy International, Inc. and an $80,000 penalty against the orchestrator of a pump-and-dump scheme in SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Ryll v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
Hertz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:11 am
Hertz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am
But in that case Google may have to shell out a few dollars (and if the judge ends up having a proper sense of humor he or she would set penalties at $1.00) but Nest will still be there competing head on with Honeywell.The danger to Nest if Honeywell were to win is not in damages ("a few dollars") but in an injunction, which would put Nest out of business. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:52 am
" Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
Since the Kentucky Supreme Court has accepted discretionary review, here is a digest of the Court of Appeals Opinion: LICHTENSTEIN V. [read post]
