Search for: "Small v. USA" Results 481 - 500 of 870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
As for relative risks greater than two, the APHA is correct that general causation may often be found with small relative risks, but the attribution of causation in an individual claimant often can be made only on probabilistic inferences that will require relative risks greater than two, or even larger. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
[or] the small extent to which [the later work] borrows from the original. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:33 pm by Patent Docs
Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm by The Book Review Editor
III There are rare exceptions, of course, preeminent among them that of a soldier bayonetting a small child. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Counsel for the Defendant may thus want to point out to the court that the plaintiff has failed to prove up the essential terms of the contract, and cite the Williams v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm by Matt Danzer
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm by Wells Bennett
  The pen register provision was designed so as not to impose significant burdens on the government, according to Judge Kollar-Kotelly; the USA PATRIOT ACT had lowered the pen register provision’s legal standard from “reasonable suspicion” to “relevance. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm by Bill Marler
 This hyper-toxin-producing strain has been a cause of serious outbreaks of healthcare-associated disease in humans in North America and Europe, and was found among a small subset of specimens from community acquired cases in Connecticut. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court denied review in Pruitt v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:34 am by Joy Waltemath
In what is likely to be viewed as a big win for employers seeking to defend religious discrimination claims, a federal district court in Nebraska granted an employer’s Rule 52 motion for judgment after trial on Phase I of EEOC litigation on behalf of Muslim employees claiming they were denied time for prayers required by their religion (EEOC v JBS USA, LLC, D. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Carter, on filing deadlines for claims of fraud against the government; 13-43, Maersk Drilling USA v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
 And they will be back at it again for the October 17 deadline when the government needs to raise the debt limit so that the USA can pay its bills. [read post]