Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 481 - 500 of 1,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Stephen Page
In this regard counsel referred to Nettler & Nettler [2009] FamCAFC 185at [28], which identified this as the guiding standard in relation to the valuation of land, as articulated in Spencer v Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418.The fact that a business does not sell need not be taken as indicative of the value of shares of a business; the test laid down in Spencer v Commonwealth can only be applied where there is a ready market, and is “of no… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The review focuses "largely on the controversial decision issued by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Spencer L. Reames
  The respective objections raised multiple theories for rejection of, and affirmative defenses against, the charity’s claim including (i) forgery of the decedent’s signature, (ii) lack of due execution, (iii) lack of consideration, (iv) lapse upon the decedent’s death, (v) laches and unclean hands, (vi) expiration of the statute of limitations, (vii) fraudulent inducement, and (viii) the decedent’s lack of capacity. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
The case, Data Direct Technologies Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc [2009] EWHC 97 (Ch), was heard by Mr Justice Floyd who gave judgment on 26 January, and picked up by the Lawtel subscription-only service.Data Direct claimed payment of software maintenance fees which, it alleged, were due from retail giants Marks & Spencer under the terms of a software licence. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am by Andrew Ramonas
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Fourteen years later, a Pennsylvania court recognized that a physician might not be the best expert on nursing standards, but it still allowed physicians' testimony to be admitted because, "all areas of medical expertise within the knowledge of nurses are also within the knowledge of medical doctors" (Taylor v Spencer Hospital, 292 A2d 449, 452 [Pa Super 1972]). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:04 am
Click here for a more detailed summary.PD-0297-08, Johnny Ray Ocon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
Spencer recently prevailed in the Ninth Circuit defending the City of Stockton in a high-profile employment law dispute (Hittle v. [read post]