Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
I was quoted in his article and there is a brief discussion of United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
I was quoted in his article and there is a brief discussion of United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:19 am
However, in Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
United Steel, etc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
United States, Heath v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law of conviction, and Jesner v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am
Recently, all eyes in the legal community turned to a federal district court in Alabama in the case of National Small Business United v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Fallon of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied a Motion for Summary Judgement on the issue of respondeat superior in the case of Bittel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
United States, No. 08-1301. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:15 am
United States District Court Judge Susan C. [read post]
