Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 481 - 500 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2010, 6:21 pm by Coby Nixon
Feb. 9, 2010) (Thrash, J.)Judge Thrash granted the Defendant’s motion to transfer this declaratory action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota for consolidation with the Defendant’s first-filed suit for patent infringement. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Minnesota: State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
 One of the suits was removed to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction and ultimately transferred to the District of Minnesota pursuant to an order of the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court held that even though the state of Minnesota itself could not be subject to a lawsuit because it enjoyed sovereign immunity, its officer—there the state attorney general—could be sued for anticipatory relief. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court held that even though the state of Minnesota itself could not be subject to a lawsuit because it enjoyed sovereign immunity, its officer—there the state attorney general—could be sued for anticipatory relief. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
However, the Minnesota Supreme Court subsequently considered the admissibility of retrograde extrapolation testimony in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
However, the Minnesota Supreme Court subsequently considered the admissibility of retrograde extrapolation testimony in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:26 am by Adam Gillette
Kent, a former judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Whether the states had standing to bring this case was addressed in the following:The [federal] Government argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the States have no standing to sue. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:40 am by Steve Lubet
”  They do not, however, explain how this District Court has authority to disregard Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]