Search for: "State v. Board of County Commissioners" Results 481 - 500 of 805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2014, 1:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
They filed a complaint against the County of Currituck, the Currituck Board of Commissioners, and the commissioners themselves in their official capacities. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Joe Koncelik
Carroll County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 94-M-454 (April 19, 1996); Hufford v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:54 pm by Lee Tankle
In a case which will interest public and private sector employers alike, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 87 v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:07 pm
Unfortunately for Bright, our case law also requires us to side against him in his lawsuit against the Gallia County Board of Commissioners (“the Board”), the Gallia County Public Defender Commission (“the Commission”), and the Gallia County Criminal Defense Corporation (“the Corporation”). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 2 April is the matter of R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In Board of Directors of The Colchester Towne Condominium Council Of Co-Owners, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Frederick County Board of Commissioners v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:27 am
The OATH Taxi and Limousine Tribunal appeals board reversed that ruling and reinstated plaintiffs license. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:21 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Purportedly under the authority of the Colorado Areas and Activities of State Interest Act, § 24-65-101, et seq., the Board of County Commissioners (“Board”) “has specific authority to consider and designate matters of state interest . . . and to adopt guidelines and regulations for administration of areas and activities of state interest. . . [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
York v Mills, 250 AD2d 122, leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 803, the Appellate Division noted that “no local legislative body is empowered to enact laws or regulations which supersede State statutes, particularly with regard to the maintenance, support or administration of the educational system. [read post]