Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 481 - 500
of 14,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 10:53 pm
In an opinion by Justice Lloyd Karmeier for a unanimous Court, the Justices held in Nelson v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:26 am
It did this under the power conferred by Rule 104(2) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 which states that the CAT may “make any order it thinks fit in relation to the payment of costs”. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 3:01 pm
In Truth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: AC33801 - Lucarelli v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC33885 - State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18465 - State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC32820 - State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: AC33283 - Taylor v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Envirotest Systems Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:04 pm
United States (1928). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
Halkbank relies on Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011) Zinda v The Governing Body of Barn Hill Community High & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 690 (17 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bramall v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2011] EWHC 1531 (Admin) (17 June 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Beazley… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Employment Opinions Body: SC18655 - Schuman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Progressives who feel reason and justice is on their side believe that they cannot help but prevail before such a body. [read post]