Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2015, 9:13 pm
Jacoby v Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Englewood, 2015 WL 6160248 (NJ Super. 10/5/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances Tagged: parking [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Majid was upset at comments made on Facebook which he believed implied he had been able to buy a development site at a cheap price from Stockton Borough Council. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 2:57 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 1:19 pm
In London Borough of Town Hamlets v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
” Tagore v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
A July 2015 appellate court decision, State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
The Court applied a similar rule in the context of public employees’ petition rights in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:30 am
According to evidence provided in the case of Nzolameso v City of Westminster, in October 2013 48% of the temporary accommodation provided Westminster was outside the borough. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
” Ealing’s Allocation Policy stated, as noted in the judgment: f) Households that have not been resident in the Borough for the last 5 years. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea [2015] EWCA Civ 711 At issue in this second appeal from a s.204 appeal was whether it was reasonable for Ms Poshteh to have refused an offer of accommodation. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:02 am
But short, the UT found that the FTT in this case was wrong to uphold a ‘separated family’ appeal on the basis that Reg B13 was not affected by the decision in R v Housing Benefit Review Board for Swale Borough Council, ex party Marchant. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2000, in Chen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 am
Jason McCourty Titans Jersey Jurrell Casey Jersey As with public school students, veterans enrolled at private universities have access to funds from various GI Bill programs, depending on the length of service, dates served and other factors5 and 12, choose a snowboard that features a 26 cm waist width For users who wish a big and clear screen and good overall quality, this is the way to go I’ve struggled with wanting to leave you for months but my big heart didn’t want to hurt YOU or… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:18 am
See In re United States, 669 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
Borough of Collingdale (E.D. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:38 pm
In Issa v Hackney London Borough Council (1997) 29 H.L.R. 640, the court noted that the failure to update s.8 left tenants …wholly without remedy in the civil courts against their landlords, however grievously their health may have suffered because they are living in damp, unfit conditions… Likewise, in Habinteg Housing Association v James (1994) 27 HLR 299: We are told that the Law Commission has been considering such a problem. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
The DWP ‘off-flow’ figures for Job Seekers Allowance state that between 90-94% of claimants ended a JSA claim within 12 months. [read post]
