Search for: "State v. Distante"
Results 481 - 500
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The case is Morgenthau v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:29 am
In a recent ruling issued by the Southern District of California, Ewing v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:51 am
The civil rights group challenging the segregation law in Plessy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
At Capital Appellate Advocacy, Lawrence Ebner maintains that “[t]he real Supreme Court Bar is not limited to the small number of very talented attorneys who repeatedly handle oral arguments before the Court,” but “is composed of hundreds of attorneys from around the United States who author and file Supreme Court petitions and briefs. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:25 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:51 am
Large corporations can usually afford to litigate cases in distant courts. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
" Even worse, Morris threatens to file suit in Canada, because DirectBuy does business there in addition to the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
And check out an ACLU-exclusive PATRIOT scenario, a possibility for the not-too-distant future... [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:58 am
Luis V. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 8:22 am
From the GBIC’s point of view, regulators not only have the duty of supervising individual players to ensure a fair and secure state of play whilst observing the rules – but in particular, to ascertain a level playing field and fair rules. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:03 pm
That story was repeated after World War II, after Brown v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:11 pm
For a U.S. case of seed saving, see Monsanto v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
(See, SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:33 pm
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:43 pm
As my colleague discussed at the time, in Bridgeman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
So, while this decision hands Jacoby & Meyers a temporary victory, non-lawyer ownership of New York law firms remains a distant goal. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
As a consequence, even going back into the distant past yields few precedents of accounts of profits in trade mark cases. [read post]
