Search for: "State v. GP" Results 481 - 500 of 1,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm by Tom Goldstein
  First, does the “search” caused by installing a GPS device require a warrant? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by Kali Borkoski
In Court coverage from the weekend, Adam Liptak of the New York Times previews United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:12 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a closely divided opinion in Riley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:47 am
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*El-Nahal alleged that the installation of such devices having tracking abilities amounted to a property-based search within meaning of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
There are plaintiff’s conduct issues in such cases like Rosenberg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Weaver (involving a GPS device) from the facts of the most factually similar federal precedent, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Last month,in People v Weaver (5/12/09)(discussed here, the Court of Appeals held that the New York Constitution requires that a warrant issued upon probable cause be issued before the police can monitor someone's whereabouts by surreptitiously attaching an electronic device (GPS) to that person's automobile. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In Cunningham, a State agency, suspecting that a State employee was submitting false time reports, attached a global positioning system (GPS) device to the employee's personal automobile without the employee’s knowledge. [read post]