Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 481 - 500 of 2,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
This week saw the publication of the Civil Justice statistics for the Royal Courts of Justice 2016. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:10 pm
The Court has posted the transcripts for both United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am by Conor McEvily
United States, and its two Eighth Amendment juvenile life-without-parole cases, Miller v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am by Legal Beagle
The Bill was passed in March 2009, got Royal Assent the following month, and came fully into force in June 2009. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 11:40 am by Simon Lester
Spain, the tribunal was of a view that the state’s assurances that originated from Royal Decree 661/2007 and which stated that the original rate of returns would remain were so ‘adamantly clear’ that it did not require a ‘particularly sophisticated analysis’, such as legal due diligence. [read post]