Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2012, 4:55 am
ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM, ET AL. 11-626 LOZMAN, FANE v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
Royal Crown Co., 892 F.3d at 1366. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
Three states have dealt with this issue already: Missouri sided with the Kansas City Royals, but in Missouri the tickets were taxable, 32 S.W.3d 560 (Mo. 2000); Wisconsin sided with the state against the Milwaukee Brewers, arguably based on a narrow statutory exception that does not exist in Ohio, 111 Wis.2d 383 (1983); Minnesota also sided with the state against the Minnesota Twins on the grounds they were a “free token of goodwill,” 587… [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Further, it castigated the RCMP, stating, “There is also a disquieting fact that, on the record before us, it seems that the authorities were much quicker to intervene to protect Mr. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:29 am
Co., 31 AD3d 710, 711; Schachter v Royal Ins. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* Polo not the same as football, but Royal Berks give Yanks a partial whippingJeremy pens of Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related tradebmark dispute involving many, many horses. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:25 pm
That was the case in Wang v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:12 pm
Royal 16-7393 Issue: Whether refusal to consider the inflationary impact of obsolete testing norms on IQ scores is contrary to or an unreasonable application of Atkins v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Royal, 875 F.3d at 907 n.5 (collecting state cases); see also US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
-Dec. 2022) [full-text]"Deporting with care: Detention in Sweden," Chapter in Deportation Limbo: State Violence and Contestations in the Nordics (Manchester Univ. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
United Steel, etc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
(See Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578 [1997]; Basso v Miller, 40NY2d 233 (1976); Jaume v Ry Mgt. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
Too bad for you, dude; from Lindblad v. [read post]
