Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss"
Results 481 - 500
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 1:24 pm
Strauss (Columbia Law School) has posted Legislation that Isn't - Attending to Rulemaking's Democracy Deficit (California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:31 am
Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:21 pm
Strauss's article summarizing the key issues surrounding the PCAOBcase and laying the groundwork for the forthcoming discussion. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:34 am
Strauss v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
He cites the Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 11:19 am
Mitchell's critique of Strauss' article "The Modernizing Mission of Judicial Review. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:52 pm
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
In Strauss v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:31 am
The plaintiffs' attorney, Waukeen McCoy, represented plaintiffs in the In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008).In Strauss v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Xie v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Bauer, Thomas Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:00 pm
09/04/09 hunter of justice, by law professor Nan Hunter:As Professor Hunter observes, Yes on 8 successfully opposed the Campaign for California Families (CCF) when it sought to participate in Strauss v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the court or… [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:09 am
"Van Hollen's decision bears at least superficial resemblance to decisions by California Attorney General Jerry Brown to oppose Prop. 8 in Strauss v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004), Padilla v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:45 am
District Court Judge Vaughn Walker on Wednesday made clear that he did not get what he wanted from the parties' most recent filing in the Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Landsman & Funk, P.C. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP) Israel Israel applies to be PCT international search authority (The IP Factor) Tel Aviv District Court refuses preliminary injunction to Strauss Ice Creams who claims packaging on Nestle’s ‘La Cremeria’ ice cream infringes its ‘Cremisimo’ ice cream (The IP Factor) Kenya Africa Growth and Opportunity Act: Trade breaks or heartbreaks? [read post]
