Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
These include making a pitch for jury nullification (Strickland), letting the client commit perjury (Nix v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bear in mind, we're talking about such minimal competence as to meet the criteria of Strickland v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
Cooper and its companion case, Missouri v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The State in both cases, argued that there can be no ineffective assistance under the case of Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The Court denied relief in Strickland, but then in a couple of more recent cases (Wiggins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
Congratulations again to the panelists in “The Title Fight: Print v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The court focused on the familiar ineffective assistance test in Strickland v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm
and (2) whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
and (2) whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
In KSR v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:50 am
Strickland, 87 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 1996). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
The high standard of Strickland would bar relief under either analysis.U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
[I]t is apparent both that the claim of ineffective assistance was exhausted in the military courts and that it was briefed under the correct legal standard, namely, Strickland v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court's interpretation under AEDPA and whether the state court's interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:55 am
Gertner dissents, arguing that Strickland's IAC test, and the evidence before the state court, supported the prior opinion's remand for an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivity and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivty and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
