Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 7:53 am
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 401 (2012). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
The 11th Amendment has been seen as quite strong — preventing the Federal Courts from hearing “any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:42 am
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judge Eginton, has ruled in the case of E.K. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Department of Justice has filed this petition for rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:09 pm
United States) just a couple of months ago. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
Plan & Tr. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
More recently, in Hassen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
Ayala demonstrates, no one cares if the United States is slowly moving back to the days of all-white juries. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Linares of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled the employer had not overcome the strong presumption of public access to the terms of settlements in cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am
Employees v Huntington, 2014 NY Slip Op 03271, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublic Officers Law §18*permits a political or civil subdivision of the State whose governing body has agreed by the adoption of local law, by-law, resolution, rule or regulation to “confer the benefits of the section” upon its employees, and (ii) to be held liable for the costs incurred under these provisions including the defense and indemnification its officers and employees,… [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
We can expect to see a strong reaction from both unions and state legislatures in an attempt to mitigate the effects of this decision. [read post]
