Search for: "TORRES V. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy looks at this term’s decision in Jesner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
 The Court declined to hear a third question, asking the Court to overrule its 1998 decision in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Torres stated that the problem with free riders like Pur is that infringement “will eventually destroy the value of the reputational investment embodied in the trademark. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:05 am by James Romoser
At the Brennan Center, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy examines how political donations in state attorney general elections may be influencing some of the Republican attorneys general who are suing to dismantle the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by James Romoser
Amaury Reyes-Torres analyzes the court’s recent decision in Espinoza v. [read post]