Search for: "U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals" Results 481 - 500 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
National Labor Relations Board, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) which prevented an award of backpay to an undocumented alien who had never been legally authorized to work in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
NLRB (2002) 535 U.S. 137 from asserting such claims. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the sentences in July 2016 and stayed any action until the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 5:09 am by Matthew Kolken
”  In December 2005, the Board of Immigration Appeals denied Palij’s appeal.The removal of Palij to Germany was effectuated through close cooperation between the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security and State. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
The district court granted the government summary judgment, deferring to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) determination under section 1153(h)(3). [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 1:39 am by admin
This will allow these individuals to attend their immigrant visa interviews abroad, without having to worry about a potential three- or ten-year bar to reentering the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Jayesh Rathod
While the case was pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals, Pereira was decided, but the board ruled that the two-step approach (NTA + hearing notice) was sufficient to trigger the stop-time rule. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 2000 to 2001 and as senior advisor to the Under Secretary for Enforcement at the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:38 am
While the IJ found that the petitioner was a credible witness, he also found that the testimony did not support a finding of past or likely future persecution, and was backed up on this by the Board of Immigration Appeals and the court. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is an unusual federal appellate ruling interpreting CAN-SPAM because it came to the court from the Board of Immigration Appeals. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:26 am by Kevin Johnson
” It did not remand the case to the court of appeals or the Board of Immigration Appeals for further proceedings, thereby suggesting that the case had come to an end. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by ALeonard
  The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the IJ, finding that indecent exposure in violation of Sec. 314 is a crime of moral turpitude. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Sarah E. Murphy, Esq.
  Rather, the term has been defined by a series of decisions issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals and the federal courts. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
U.S.: the Board member who denied Albathani's appeal is recorded as having decided over 50 cases on October 31, 2002, a rate of one every ten minutes over the course of a nine-hour day. . . . [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court, though, does not “try to resolve this conflict definitively in this case,” because it concludes that the Board of Immigration Appeals has to reevaluate its rule for applying the “involving moral turpitude” standard in light of a 2015 attorney general decision. [read post]