Search for: "U.S. v. Holmes" Results 481 - 500 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 5:36 am by Dennis Crouch
”    The purpose of the 2011 amendment was to abrogate the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Holmes Group v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm by Rick
” The Wikipedia article just linked appears to incorrectly note that “Oliver Wendell Holmes” put forth the utilitarian argument for this in the case of Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
As in the case of transfer, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Immigration & Naturalization Service v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:46 pm
The attorneys are relying upon the Supreme Court's 1947 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Cristina Gutierrez, at his trial for the murder of Hae Min Lee makes for a compelling way to teach Strickland v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
" "A potent precedent favoring the constitutionally-questionable provisions of the United States Patriot Act passed shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the 1917 law was given the Supreme Court's approval in Schenk v United States, when Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, 'When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight....'… [read post]