Search for: "US Dep. of Justice"
Results 481 - 500
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Restitution is reactive and property is generative: corrective justice seeks to restore a status quo, while new property rights deviate from the status quo. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Government Drone Overflights May Violate Fourth Amendment, Trigger Exclusionary Rule
27 Mar 2021, 12:59 pm
United States (2001), Justice Scalia [wrote]: … The present case involves officers on a public street engaged in more than naked-eye surveillance of a home. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
In my view, nothing in the current disclosures should cause us to lose faith in the essential integrity of the post-Watergate system of delegated intelligence oversight. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Here's what Judge Edward Korman said about Fritz Grunbaum and the evidence that the Nazis looted his art collection in a concurring opinion he wrote while sitting by designation on the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bakalar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Noble Homes relied on an earlier equally important case, The Sec’y, United States Dep’t of Hous. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
Changes are recommended for officer certification and de-certification, training, agency accreditation, use of force policy and data collection, and recruiting and retention. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Obama, 10-10652, which involved questions about the propriety of a judge presiding over a case in which she was a named defendant, was summarily affirmed: because eight of the nine Justices were named defendants in the case, the order list noted, “the Court lacks a quorum,” and Justice Kagan, “the only qualified Justice,” was “of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next term of the Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Obama, 10-10652, which involved questions about the propriety of a judge presiding over a case in which she was a named defendant, was summarily affirmed: because eight of the nine Justices were named defendants in the case, the order list noted, “the Court lacks a quorum,” and Justice Kagan, “the only qualified Justice,” was “of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next term of the Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Dep’t of Transp., 545 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
To protect ourselves and our loved ones, and in our collective effort to stop the spread, some of us turned to agencies like those at issue in this case. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Dep’t of Justice, Re: Amenability of the President, Vice President and Other Civil Officers to Federal Criminal Prosecution While in Office, at 36 (Sept. 24, 1973) (“With respect to his responsibility as tie breaker his immunity from prosecution should be analogized to that of Members of Congress under Article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
The opinions are long, and I can’t fully do them justice, but I quote below some excerpts. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:26 pm
You can't stop us! [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:24 pm
Davis, 737 So. 2d 1170, 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (quoting Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Dep’t of Social Services of the City of New York. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
Ninth Circuit: A jury might think that was an unreasonable use of force. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Bombardier, Inc., No. 5:03-CV-1397 (NAM/DEP), 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
