Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 481 - 500 of 51,088
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
Bruin acquired, used, or disclosed Applied’s trade secrets by improper means—but Applied wasn’t harmed, and Bruin wasn’t enriched by that improper acquisition, use, or disclosure. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
CCNV (1984)), and the government's power to limit the use of property used for a public university is even greater than its power as to parks (Widmar v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Given that the selection of studies that go into a systematic review and meta-analysis can be dispositive of its conclusion, undue subjectivity or ad [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
He has predicted a “bloodbath” if he is not elected (although his meaning has been contested, with some saying he was referring to violence and others that “Trump was talking about US automakers. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Court of Chancery recently examined such an agreement in In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
Govern yourself accordingly.If someone sent you this email, subscribe here.SHARE HEARSAYDon’t keep us a secret. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am by Eleonora Rosati
In fact, this is not Puma versus Rihanna but, eventually, Rihanna’s Instagram activities, unintentionally, happened to become the death knell to Puma’s registered Community Design (‘RCD’) no. 3320555-0002 (‘contested RCD’).But how could it be that a famous fashion icon failed to establish valid design protection for a shoe, in the EU, that used to become a bestseller (here and here)? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:41 am by Eric Goldman
The jury ruled that the tattoo wasn’t substantially similar to the photo, which is a remarkable conclusion given the intentionally high degree of similarity between the tattoo and the photo used as a reference. [read post]