Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia: In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:54 pm
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
He also wrote the famous opinion for United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The New Jersey Consumer Fraud Laws New Jersey has some of the most aggressive and comprehensive consumer fraud laws in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Moreover, in Weber v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
Battles between brand owners are frequently fought in the United States in two forums: the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and federal district court. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 9:05 am
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:22 pm
Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm
The plaintiffs also argued that recognition the foreign proceeding would be manifestly contrary to United States public policy because the court records in the foreign proceeding were sealed. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)--McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am
Some Congressmen have insisted that no visas should be processed until the District’s borders have been effectively sealed, saying they don’t want to repeat the mistakes the United States has made with its international borders. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, and most state evidentiary law, Schepers’ prior statements are admissible as they bear on his credibility and the truth of his later, scurrilous writings: “When a hearsay statement … has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. [read post]
