Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 481 - 500
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
§1350, ALLOWS COURTS TO RECOGNIZE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF NATIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF A SOVEREIGN OTHER THAN THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Courts to adjudicate human rights disputes that have nothing to do with the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
After oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States on February, 28 and our featured discussion analyzing those arguments, it was reported that the Court, in the Kiobel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
§1350, allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:17 am
However, upon oral arguments, the questioning veered towards the broader question of whether the United States Courts could even hear human rights cases when the alleged abuses occurred outside the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
” (Judicial Division of the Council of State, 11 May 2011, 201011782/1/V1) The second example concerns a Palestinian gay from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Now, the Court intends to decide:Whether and under what circumstances the Alien Tort Statute allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
Pete Yost of the Associated Press reports on yesterday’s testimony by FBI Director Robert Mueller before a House subcommittee on the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
But in that case the only place they could sue was in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
