Search for: "United States v. Mitchell" Results 481 - 500 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court on March 19 refused to hear a case involving a challenge to a DNA sample taken from a Pennsylvania man (Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/19/08-99005.pdf United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Ziegler-McPherson, Americanization in the States: Immigrant Social Welfare Policy, Citizenship, and National Identity in the United States, 1908-1929 (University Press of Florida, 2009).Mitchell Snay (Denison University) reviews Leslie A. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
’ Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (emphasis in original). [read post]
On October 13, 2017, the Third Circuit held in Secretary United States Department of Labor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm by Jeralyn
Additionally, in developing this proposed regulation, the CDCR was guided by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:29 am
In other words, the paradigm case for the Roberts Court's restriction of the spending power is likely to be not United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone… [read post]