Search for: "United States v. Moore"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 5:24 am
Being a reader of the Amsterdam Daily News, which describes itself as "one of New York's largest and most influential Black-owned and operated business institutions" and which has a circulation of about 25,000, is a legitimate ground for exercising a peremptory challenge against an African-American jury panel member, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997) Lujan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 3:02 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, (8th Cir., Feb. 4, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Muslim inmate's free exercise, RFRA and RLUIPA claims. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:17 am
Defendant appealed the matter to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”). [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:53 pm
., the Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office, actingthrough the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, instituted inter partes review of Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:00 am
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 9:29 pm
App. 30, 42-43, 683 S.E.2d 316, 322-23 (2009); see also United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
In Julie Moore Walker, et al v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
It was first used by Judge Moore in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 12:37 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
The Smiths and Judge Moore were certainly trailblazers, paving the way for legal precedent supporting the LGBTQ+ community for years to follow.The full text of the decision can be found here: Smith v Avanti. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 7:52 am
Hillman of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation, recently granted a motion to drop two parties from the litigation pursuant to Rule 21. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
He would have been there while still an employee of the taxpayers of the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
United States, 132 S. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:49 am
Canceling COBRA coverageGeissal v Moore Medical Corp., USSC, 524 U.S. 74If an employer discovers that an individual participating in its health insurance plan under COBRA is also covered as a dependent under a different health insurance plan, may it cancel his or her coverage? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
