Search for: "United States v. Sealed Defendant One" Results 481 - 500 of 669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by J
This requires the notice to contain the common seal of the company or be signed by two directors or one director and the secretary (1989 Act) or, additionally in the case of the 2006 Act, by a director in the presence of a third party who attests the signature: Hilmi and Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 314. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm by Anthony Gaughan
  The United States in 2018 is a long way from Elizabethan England. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm by Kelly
Playables (1709 Blog) (IPKat) United States US Patents – Decisions ITC issues final determination finding violation of 19 USC § 1337 and terminates investigation in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) brought by Rambus (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) District Court Delaware: Source code for future products is discoverable: BigBand Networks Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am by Eugene Volokh
A case involving an alleged sexual assault of a student at a high school, in which the school district itself was a defendant, was sealed. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joe Manchin and Kirsten Sinema made clear they would not weaken the 60-vote rule, defending it as a tool to protect minority-party rights and promote bipartisanship. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am by Jeff Welty
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Wells Bennett
I believe, as a legal matter: Abu Khattala may be detained under the law of war, outside the “public safety” exception to Miranda, under the President’s executive and commander-in-chief authority to use force in defending the vital national interests of the United States. [read post]