Search for: "United States v. State of Tex."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2022, 6:45 am
State (1995 Tex. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:07 pm
H-16-1053.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am
Moreno, 2016 Tex. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:58 am
United States, No. 07-359. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am
Darr et al., 114 Tex. 516 (1925) (read on LexisNexis Academic with Duke NetID).To learn more about the history of women on the bench, search the Duke Libraries Catalog for the subject heading "Women judges – United States". [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:26 am
Tex. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, applying strict scrutiny, upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policies. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
WR-61600-03 (Tex. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
"The government had argued that the location data was a business record, and thus does not fall within the protections of the Fourth Amendment.Such records are theoretically obtainable under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) without a warrant as are call records, text messages, subscriber information, etc., but because cell site location data may allow the government to track a person's every movement, some courts require a higher standard.The great showdown for the government's… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]