Search for: "Wales v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Most lawyers in the United States would think it malpractice to engage in such a practice. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:35 am
Newcastle United FC' playsin black and white. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:32 am
Morgan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
With its international platform and offices in the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Australia, Seyfarth Shaw’s experienced team of lawyers assists companies with large multi-jurisdictional employment law projects of a strategic, compliance and transactional nature, including issues involving noncompetes and trade secrets. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
With its international platform and offices in the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Australia, Seyfarth Shaw’s experienced team of lawyers assists companies with large multi-jurisdictional employment law projects of a strategic, compliance and transactional nature, including issues involving noncompetes and trade secrets. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
In Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost Products Ltd v F C Frost Ltd [2013] EWPCC 34 (Patents County Court, England and Wales) is a decision of Mr Justice Vos from 26 July 2013. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:30 am
Tamiz v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Robart in the Western District of Washington is the world's pioneer in FRAND rate-setting decisions, but cases presenting similar challenges are pending in other jurisdictions, including Germany and the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:47 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
