Search for: "Watson Appeal"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:23 pm
The July 2015 High Court decision in the Davis/Watson judicial review of DRIPA followed the CJEU DigitalRights Ireland case in April 2014, which invalidated the EU Data Retention Directive. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Peter Margulies observes that “the Court left the door open to revisit its order once the Ninth Circuit rules on the government’s appeal of Judge Watson’s injunction,” and hopes “that the Ninth Circuit will uphold the district court on exempting refugee assurances from the EO, and the Supreme Court will then permit Judge Watson’s entire order to go into effect. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:16 pm
(quoting Watson, 423 U.S. at 449 (Marshall, J., dissenting)); Ronald J. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
Moreover, according to Andrew Watson, DeAngelo’s attorney, the ruling is a landmark victory for labor activists. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:06 am
Other speakers confirmed for the conference include Tom Watson MP, "the vociferous critic of the Digital Economy Act" [not to be confused with Tom Watson the golfer, who may well be a bit tee'd off by digital economy issues for all we know], and the Canadian Craphound, activist and author Cory Doctorow. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:54 am
Watson owed her. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
The administration will surely appeal, probably all the way up to the Supreme Court if (as seems likely) the Ninth Circuit affirms Judge Watson’s decision. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Watson had his genome sequenced. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
Watson did not rule on the constitutional question. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:24 am
Watson , --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 2043851 (11th Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
The local Court of Appeals ultimately ruled that this was a private prosecution, not necessary to have been done in the name of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:48 pm
In the district court, Watson and Sandoz moved for judgment of noninfringement on the pleadings under Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
The Court of Appeal held ([2009] N [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:26 pm
: Novozymes v Danisco (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: Preliminary injunction softened after claims are rejected in reexamination: Celsis In Vitor v CellzDirect (Reexamination Alert) Products Alpharen – EU: General Court: Boards of appeal are judges not doctors! [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
The specific issue in Watson v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:00 am
No, Watson is far, far worse. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Watson (1976) 359 A.2d 548, 552; Sevigny v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Consequently, the CCA granted relief and remanded the case for a new punishment hearing.PD-0294-08, Ex parte Frank Eugene Watson: The CCA granted rehearing in this case decided in May 2009. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
The Court of Appeal has observed: “The CJEU is notorious for making pronouncements resembling those of the oracle at Delphi…”. [read post]
