Search for: "Watts v. Watts"
Results 481 - 500
of 724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 4:21 pm
It was introduced as a private members bill on 12 October 2015 by Labor MP Tim Watts and co-sponsored by fellow Labor MP Terri Butler. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
Cir. 2008) (citing Watts v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
’State v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Here's a note on a topic that has not been greatly appreciated in IP circles: the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
This conception of the human as homo fabulans (or story-telling animal) could lead us to outline a 'Critique of Narrative Reason'.Click here to purchase paper Recovering the Lost Human Stories of Law: Finding Mrs BurnsDawn WatkinsAbstract: This paper adopts a narrative approach as a means to investigating a well-known English civil law case; Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:10 am
Homeland Housewares, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:27 pm
Also see: Best Projectors for Courtroom Trial PresentationsCourtroom Projectors, Screens, and MonitorsHDMI v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
We saw it when Boulton and Watt got int [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation The PCC published three adjudications this week: Edward Watt v The Herald, This was a complaint under clause 1 by a person who had been acquitted of rape. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
Watts, 260 S.W.3d 582, 586 (Tex. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Yet the order (narrowed on appeal to 50 feet, but still unconstitutional) seems to have been based on pretty normal -- if acrimonious -- local political debate. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm
ShareDuring oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
