Search for: "Wells v. CIR" Results 481 - 500 of 14,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
  It's an exceptionally rare case when I'd say that the failure to give a surrebuttal require a new trial.But when, as here, the AUSA admits he sandbagged the defendant, and makes a new argument in closing that way well not be supported by the evidence and to which the defendant has not chance at all to respond; well, that may well be the exception that proves the rule.P.S. - I still hate the font and format the Ninth Circuit now uses in the slip opinions. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
"There are lots of other subsidiary holdings in the opinion as well -- e.g., with respect to whether there was personal jurisdiction -- and all those seem right to me as well. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
 In an opinion that may well be subject to substantial doctrinal critique.For one thing, there's this little thing called circuit precedent. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
  Well, thanks to the irrepressible Chief Judge Kozinski, we now have citeworthy precedent from Clement v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:42 am by Bexis
In our two prior posts concerning Bartlett v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:20 am
An opinion that, characteristically, is both well-written and makes sure to include a plethora of cultural and brand references.Which is great. [read post]