Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 21,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:10 am
(emphasis added) See, e.g., Howell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:25 am
The general rule is that “when descriptive or generic words are disclaimed in a registration on the Principal Register, the legal effect is that the registration does not evidence any trademark rights in the disclaimed words; rather, those words are protected only when used with the mark as a whole,” Advance News Service Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
There can be no serious doubt that it does. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
There can be no serious doubt that it does. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
Mulligan V , Attorney On Friday August 10, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the claims filed by Rachel Krumpelbeck in a product liability suit against Breg, Inc., a manufacturer of pain pumps and other medical devices. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 6:51 am
It is styled, David Fusaro v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
That amount seems about right for a case that does not proceed to trial but instead gets resolved on summary judgment.The case is Gaddis Events, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:11 am
Cuomo's office may proceed with a retaliation claim arising from his testimony to the Attorney General's office that corroborated the sexual harassment allegations that led to Cuomo's resignation.The case is Herskowitz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:22 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Yesterday’s cert. denials also generated a substantial amount of coverage, the majority of which centered on Adar v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:43 pm
A CID is a pre-litigation tool used by the Attorney General to determine whether a violation of Indiana law has occurred. * * *In Brenda & Darren Wagner v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
The case is State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
VANCE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. and TRUMP ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Bodyke, the Supreme Court held that the Adam Walsh Act’s provision that the Attorney General was to reclassify sex offenders classified under previous SORN law violated the separation of powers doctrine, because it involved the executive changing an entry that had been made by a judge. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
In his answer, Weinberg generally denied the accusations against him, and, among other defenses, he asserted the affirmative defense of duress. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:17 am
It also does not take into account non-FTSA cases filed by the same attorneys. [read post]
