Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 11,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
La position de force réfère donc à un « déséquilibre important entre les parties »[27]. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 7:10 pm
An initial term that does not start on January 1 will end on December 31st of the following year and then follow the yearly renewal cycles thereafter. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
March 27, 2008), produced a similar result even though t [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 2:44 pm
However, the Departments are exercising discretion to provide temporary deferral of enforcement with regard to the December 27, 2021 and June 1, 2022 deadlines. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
March 27, 2017). [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:13 pm
(Or, Why A Feminist Thinks Section 33 Does Matter)”. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
However, it does make an argument about the framers' intent. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:54 am
The German Draft Act does not stop here though. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm
A prognosis does not necessarily have to be made as to the specific length of time that they have remaining (Id. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:14 am
Article 19 does not focus on the Primary Examiner. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:03 am
Next, the appeals court addressed the second alleged impasse, Carey Salt’s claims regarding the June 27 implementation are without merit. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
I am not sure that its conclusion in paragraph 27 was intended to be to the effect that the DSO contract constituted, for the purposes of regulation 7, the agreement under which the works were carried out. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:41 am
The IRS attempted to deal with this uncertainty in Revenue Procedure 2020-51, released at the same time as Revenue Ruling 2020-27. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
I am not sure that its conclusion in paragraph 27 was intended to be to the effect that the DSO contract constituted, for the purposes of regulation 7, the agreement under which the works were carried out. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
1. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
I would like to quickly expand on each issue. 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
The conference voted overwhelmingly for a motion calling on the government to 1. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
The case was docketed in the Court of Appeals on February 27, 2006 as Case No. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:37 am
UIPL No. 16-20 Change 1 (27 April 2020) at I-1 (italics supplied). [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:25 am
Table 1. [read post]
