Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Brookler v. Radioshack Corporation: California Supreme Court Grants Review and Holds Pending Brinker
22 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
A week later, the California Supreme Court granted review in the Brinker case (review granted Oct. 22, 2008, S166350; see also Brinkley v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
On November 19, 2010, Pennsylvania Superior Court granted a petition for en banc reargument in Barrick v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:04 am
BREAKING NEWS: The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued an Order granting re-argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Medina v. [read post]
Employee charged with “computer trespass” for allegedly tampering with department’s computer records
22 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
” A State Supreme Court justice granted the county’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing Saunders’ petition. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm
He sued on October 8, 2008 for false arrest in superior court and filed the present suit in 2010. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm
Even though the principles of Daubert have been embraced by the entire Supreme Court, in a rare unanimous opinion, (See Weisgram v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Superior Court (“Powerine I”) 24 Cal.4th 945. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:33 am
[Zaleppa v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
She granted in part and denied in part the motion for summary judgment. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 11:33 pm
In 1983, a jury in San Bernadino County Superior Court convicted Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Superior Court (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1283, review granted Feb. 18, 2010, S179378.) [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Superior Court (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1283, review granted Feb. 18, 2010, S179378.) [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:47 pm
Superior Court (Cal. 1990)] (holding that statutory limitation was tolled from the time insured gave notice of loss until coverage was denied). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
A California federal court said so in Laster v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:31 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987), a plurality of four justices concluded that something more was required--"an action of the defendant purposefully directed toward the forum state. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
Here is the abstract: The Spending Clause has been interpreted to grant extremely broad discretion for Congress to offer conditional grants to the states - most recently in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
The Court also heard arguments (yet again) about when an extension can be granted to cure a deficient medical-malpractice expert report. [read post]
